The Times Goes Subscription Pay Wall
The great media experiment begins as London’s The Times and Sunday Times erects a paywall that requires online readers to subscribe.
So what are they selling? Simple really, either you buy today’s edition – or you buy a subscription to all the editions this month.
No atomic content sales here! No micro payments of 2p for 1 article – no! Just as we forecast, we have returned to selling newspapers!
Hurray!
The big question now is – can The Times make it work?
Well, time will tell – but let’s take a look at their offer. You have two choices
- £1 for a day pass (ie today’s edition) – sold rather like WiFi access is sold – on a time limited basis.
or
- £1 for 30 days (ie a subscription) – with repeat billing at £2 per week after the first month – or £8.66 per month.
So what does this tell us about strategy?
Clearly, everyone will choose the £1 for 30 days over the £1 for one day! So, the pricing is designed to turn us into subscribers.
And, what are we subscribing to? A £104 per year subscription. Is that a lot or a little? Well, my Economist subscription renewal has just arrived and I’m offered a 47% discount which means I pay £108 per year.
Practically the same then!
What is interesting is how this relates to buying copies at the newstand. Each copy would cost £1 during weekdays and £1.50 for the Saturday paper. The Sunday Times costs £2.
So, add it all up and you ‘could’ spend £442 per year on buying every copy of The Times and The Sunday Times. So, will the offer be shown as 77% off? Well, maybe, but who buys every copy every day? Perhaps a library – but no sane individual?
Hence, there would appear to be a growing practice of charging just over £100 for an annual subscription for a quality news feed.
And it fits well – because even if you took the view that you would only buy the paper 3 times per week plus the a Sunday paper – and not holidays – so 48 weeks of the year – your annual cost would still be £240.
And, of course, this subscription gives you access to the mobile (iphone) edition too – which, if bought through a different iPad subscription is a more expensive £9.99 per month. Now, the iPad edition is not great to navigate – the FT does a far better job – but that is another story.
The point is that the current pricing model adopted by The Times makes internet buying of newspapers a bargain!
Great – so the pricing strategy is clear – and is based on The Economist superbly successful subscription model. Now, will it work?
Want me to get off the fence and answer that? Well, of course, I have to say yes.
Why? Simply, the pricing is very attractive but also based on very sound principles – The Economist probably the best selling subscription product in the world and people are already paying for it – and The Times have taken a leaf out of their book (or newspaper).








July 7th, 2010 at 8:59 am
I disagree that the two can be so easily compared – putting to one side issues of quality and political slant, the nature of Economist articles is such that they are not replicated elsewhere. If you want to read an indepth article of the type found in the Economist, you have to pay for it – on the Economist or another indepth news magazine.
With the Times, it is a newspaper. If I don’t want to pay, I can read the same news in many other places. The question is whether people are willing to pay for that news online when they can get it free. I’m not going to as I have found the Times’ quality to have fallen over the years. That said, Murdoch is no fool, so I will watch with interest whether enough people disagree with me to make his project pay….
July 7th, 2010 at 11:48 am
Hi Peter – thanks – I agree that we can not compare the quality of the two publications – but it is interesting to note their very similar price points when it comes to subscriptions.
Also, I would just highlight that The Times – and other newspapers – are emphasising their comment much more than ever before. Look at the The Times home page and the second most important button on the navigation is ‘opinion’. Why? Well, precisely as you suggest – because opinion is unique – whereas news is now a commodity.
So, the newspapers are shifting to become more like The Economist is more ways than one.
Br
Neil